Code generator SQL
Compas code-gen also supports defining a relational schema. And is able to generate all necessary queries for all common use cases.
TIP
Requires @compas/cli
, @compas/stdlib
, @compas/store
and @compas/code-gen
to be installed.
Getting started
In the validator & type generator we have seen how to utilize the Compas type system to generate types and validators. Here we are building a separate system. Most of the time your relational model does not reflect the needs of your API consumers. To reflect that Compas advises to keep the types defining a database schema separate from the rest. Compas also does this by forcing the sql generator to output all it's files in a $outputDirectory/database
directory.
Defining the schema
At the root, a database schema in Compas is a T.object()
that defines some keys, and calls .enableQueries()
so it is picked up by the generator.
Let's start with writing a database schema to represent a blog post.
const T = new TypeCreator("database");
app.add(
T.object("post")
.keys({
title: T.string().searchable(),
body: T.string(),
isPublished: T.bool().searchable().default(false),
})
.enableQueries({
withPrimaryKey: true, // This is a default, and adds a `id: T.uuid()` to our keys.
withDates: true, // Add's a `createdAt` and `updatedAt` field for us
}),
);
Make sure to add sql
to your generators and generate again. Take a look in your generated directory and see what's generated. Some things include:
- The
DatabasePost
type - A new
database
directory containing apost.js
that contains our queries - An
queries
export indatabase/index.js
that collects all our CRUD queries - An example for the necessary Postgres DDL (ie
CREATE TABLE
queries) incommon/structure.sql
.
CRUD
The queries
export from database/index.js
contains typed CRUD related queries. All values are automatically escaped to prevent injection attacks. Let's take a look at them by example;
Inserts:
// A single insert
const [post] = await queries.postInsert(sql, {
title: "My first post",
body: "...",
});
// post => { id: "some uuid", title: "My first post", body: "...", isPublished: false, createdAt: ..., updatedAt: ... }
// Multiple inserts
const posts = await queries.postInsert(sql, [
{ title: "Post1", body: "..." },
{ title: "Post2", body: "..." },
]);
// posts => [{ id: "some uuid", title: "Post1", ... }, { id: "other uuid", title: "Post2", ... }]
// With relation
const [category] = await queries.categoryInsert(sql, { name: "Category 1" });
const [post] = await queries.postInsert(sql, {
title: "My post",
body: "...",
category: category.id,
});
// post => { id: "some-uuid", title: "My post", category: "category.id uuid", ... }
Updates:
// Update single field, without returning the new row
await queries.postUpdate(sql, {
update: { isPublished: true },
where: { id: post.id },
});
// Update single field, return all fields
const [updatedPost] = await queries.postUpdate(sql, {
update: { isPublished: true },
where: { id: post.id },
returning: "*",
});
// updatedPost => { id: post.id, title: post.title, isPublished: true }
// Update fields, return some fields
const [updatedPost] = await queries.postUpdate(sql, {
update: { isPublished: true, title: "New post title" },
where: { id: post.id },
returning: ["id", "title"],
});
// updatedPost => { id: post.id, title: "New post title" }
Deletes:
// Delete with the provided where clause
await quries.postDelete(sql, {
id: post.id,
});
Selects:
The missing part here are 'selects'. These are handled by queryEntity
functions exported from the database/entity.js
files, in our case queryPost
in database/post.js
. These are fully typed as well, and the input is validated or escaped before it is transformed in to a query. The result of the query is then transformed to conform to the types. The most important transformers being converting T.date()
columns to JS Date objects and null
values to undefined
.
// Plain select
const posts = await queryPost().exec(sql);
// posts => [{ ... }, { ... }]
// Select with where clause
const publishedPosts = await queryPost({
where: {
isPublished: true,
},
}).exec(sql);
// Or with a limit and offset
const paginatedPosts = await queryPost({
limit: 5,
offset: 10,
}).exec(sql);
// Applying custom ordering
// `orderBy` is used to apply ordering in that order,
// and `orderBySpec` can be used to provide the sort specification.
const orderedResults = await queryPost({
orderBy: ["title"],
orderBySpec: { title: "DESC" },
}).exec(sql);
All above things can of course freely be combined. Another note here is that orderBy
and where
are based on fields defined with .searchable()
in the Compas structure. This is done to make it more explicit what the main search fields are of an entity and thus may be good candidates for PostgreSQL indices.
Relations and traversal
A relational database is not useful if you can not have relations between entities. Compas also supports the most common ways of modelling them and provides a query builder to query an entity with its relations mapped in a single Postgres query.
Let's take a look at how that works, by creating a model with the following entities and their relations;
- Category entity
- Can be linked to Posts
- User entity
- Has optional settings
- Has written Posts
- UserSetting entity
- Belongs to User
- Post entity
- Written by User
- Can have linked Categories
const T = new TypeCreator("database");
app.add(
T.object("category")
.keys({
/* ... */
})
.relations(
T.oneToMany("linkedPosts", T.reference("database", "postCategory")),
)
.enableQueries({}),
T.object("user")
.keys({
/* ... */
})
.relations(
// 'Virtual' side of the relation
// 'posts' should be the same name as the last argument to the 'manyToOne'
T.oneToMany("posts", T.reference("database", "post")),
)
.enableQueries({
/* ... */
}),
T.object("userSettings")
.keys({
/* ... */
})
.relations(
// Owning side of a one-to-one relation
// The 'virtual' side is automatically added
T.oneToOne("user", T.reference("database", "user"), "settings"),
)
.enableQueries({}),
T.object("post")
.keys({
/* ... */
})
.relations(
// Owning side of the relation, a field is added named 'writer'
// which has the same type as the primary key of 'user'.
T.manyToOne("writer", T.reference("database", "user"), "posts"),
T.oneToMany("linkedCategories", T.reference("database", "postCategory")),
)
.enableQueries({
/* ... */
}),
// Many-to-many relations need a join table, this is not automatically done by Compas
// The join table consists of two manyToOne relations
T.object("postCategory")
.keys({
/* ... */
})
.relations(
T.manyToOne("post", T.reference("database", "user"), "linkedCategories"),
T.manyToOne(
"category",
T.reference("database", "category"),
"linkedPosts",
),
)
.enableQueries({}),
);
After regeneration, quite a bunch of code is added. See common/structure.sql
for how Compas suggests you to create the necessary entities and foreign keys.
With all the information that you have added in the .relations
calls, Compas can create queries that join relations and nest the result set automatically. In most of these example we use [varName]
, this is for illustrative purposes only, all calls will return an array with the results. Let's look at some examples;
One-to-one:
// Get user, but don't add join
const [user] = await queryUser({}).exec(sql);
// user => user.settings (undefined)
// Get user settings with the user.
// 'settings' has an 'undefined' type, cause you can insert a user
// without inserting settings for them.
const [user] = await queryUser({
settings: {},
}).exec(sql);
// user => user.settings (undefined|DatabaseUserSettings)
// Get settings, but don't join user.
// Since UserSettings is the owning side of the relation,
// the returned entity will have the 'id' from User.
const [userSettings] = await queryUserSettings({}).exec(sql);
// userSettings => userSettings.user (string, user.id)
// Get the settings and the user
const [userSettings] = await queryUserSettings({
user: {},
}).exec(sql);
// userSettings => userSetting.user (DatabaseUser)
Many-to-one:
From the owning side, this behaves the same as the 'One-to-one' owning side.
// Get post, but don't join writer
const [post] = await queryPost({}).exec(sql);
// post => post.writer (string, user.id);
// Get post with the writer
const [post] = await queryPost({
writer: {},
}).exec(sql);
// post => post.writer (DatabaseUser)
One-to-many:
// Get user with posts
const [user] = await queryUser({
posts: {},
}).exec(sql);
// user => user.posts (DatabasePost[])
// Get post with categories.
// Need to traverse to many-to-one relations
const [post] = await queryPost({
linkedCategories: {
category: {},
},
}).exec(sql);
// post => post.linkedCategories (DatabasePostCategory[])
// post => post.linkedCategories[0].category (DatabaseCategory[])
// post => post.linkedCategories[0].post (string, join is not added)
Combined:
All relations can freely be combined. So you can query categories named 'sql' or 'code-gen' with all posts in the category and their writer like so:
const categories = await queryCategories({
// Joins
linkedPosts: {
post: {
writer: {},
},
},
// Only query sql and code-gen categories
where: {
nameIn: ["sql", "code-gen"],
},
// Order by category.name ASC
orderBy: ["name"],
orderBySpec: {
name: "ASC",
},
});
Where options
All searchable fields and fields used in relations can be used in where clauses. The values used in where-clauses are validated and escaped, so user input can be used.
const users = await queryUser({
where: {
name: "Jan",
},
}).exec(sql);
// select * from "user" u WHERE u.name = 'Jan';
const users = await queryUser({
where: {
ageGreaterThan: 18,
},
}).exec(sql);
// select * from "user" u WHERE u.age > 18;
const users = await queryUser({
where: {
nameILike: "de Vries",
roleIn: ["moderator", "admin"],
},
}).exec(sql);
// select * from "user" u WHERE u.name ILIKE '%de Vries%' AND role = ANY(ARRAY['moderator', 'admin'])
const users = await queryUser({
where: {
$or: [
{
nameILike: "de Vries",
roleIn: ["moderator", "admin"],
},
{
id: uuid(),
},
],
},
}).exec(sql);
// select * from "user" u WHERE (u.name ILIKE '%de Vries%' AND role = ANY(ARRAY['moderator', 'admin'])) OR (u.id = 'uuid-value')
const users = await queryUser({
where: {
settingsNotExists: {
// nested where clause
},
},
}).exec(sql);
// select * from "user" u WHERE NOT EXISTS (select from "userSettings" us WHERE us.user = u.id);
const users = await queryUser({
where: {
// Useful for jsonb fields, or if field is not searchable
$raw: query`u."emailPreferences"->>'receiveNewsletter' = true`,
},
}).exec(sql);
// select * from "user" u WHERE (u."emailPreferences"->>'receiveNewsletter' = true);
Another useful option provided by the where clause are the viaXxx
options. This allows you to query results from table X
via their relation to table Y
. It results in queries that can span across over multiple tables to fetch results with only a single piece of information that may not be immediately related to what you need. For example:
const postsForUser = await queryPost({
where: {
viaWriter: {
where: {
name: "Docs author",
},
},
},
}).exec(sql);
const categoriesThatUserHasPostIn = await queryCategory({
where: {
viaLinkedPosts: {
where: {
viaPost: {
where: {
viaWriter: {
where: {
name: "Docs author",
},
},
},
},
},
},
},
});
const dashboardsForAllGroupsThatAUserIsIn = await queryDashboard({
where: {
// Owner is in this case a group
viaOwner: {
where: {
viaUsers: {
where: {
id: user.id,
},
},
},
},
},
}).exec(sql);
Atomic updates
The generated update queries, can do a bit more than partial updates. Atomic updates are supported as well. This way you can safely execute some operators on the existing value, utilizing Postgres. This prevents race-conditions in your code between the select of some value and the update of that value.
Multiple atomic updates can be combined in the same update query, however, only a single atomic update can be done per column. This is also enforced in the types and validators. Let's look at some examples, based on the column type.
Booleans:
// Flip the boolean value
await queries.jobUpdate(sql, {
update: {
isComplete: {
$negate: true,
},
} /* ... */,
});
Numbers:
// Add to the balance field
await queries.userUpdate(sql, {
update: {
balance: {
$add: 5,
},
} /* ... */,
});
// Subtract from the balance field
await queries.userUpdate(sql, {
update: {
balance: {
$subtract: 5,
},
} /* ... */,
});
// $multiply and $divide are supported as well
Strings:
// Flip the boolean value
await queries.userUpdate(sql, {
update: {
personalNotes: {
$append: "\nSome important addition.",
},
} /* ... */,
});
Dates
This uses Postgres intervals, see the Postgres docs for supported intervals
await queries.userUpdate(sql, {
update: {
licenseValidTill: {
$add: "1 year 2 months 3 hours",
},
} /* ... */,
});
// Oops, conditions of our virtual buddy are not great
await queries.virtualBuddyUpdate(sql, {
update: {
virtualLifeExpectancy: {
$subtract: "2 hours 3 seconds",
},
} /* ... */,
});
Jsonb:
These values are not thoroughly validated, so use with caution. $set
uses jsonb_set behavior.
// Disable email notifications of watched issues
await queries.userUpdate(sql, {
update: {
emailPreferences: {
$set: {
path: ["subscriptions", "watchedIssues"],
value: false,
},
},
} /* ... */,
});
// Remove all subscriptions
await queries.userUpdate(sql, {
update: {
emailPreferences: {
$remove: {
path: ["subscriptions"],
},
},
} /* ... */,
});
Date and time handling
Compas uses timestampt
for T.date()
types. This ensures that you can insert any date with timezone, and instruct Postgres to return them in whatever timezone you want. Any query, except queryBuilder.execRaw()
, will return JavaScript Date objects.
There is also T.date().dateOnly()
which uses a Postgres date
column. Compas makes sure that the Postgres client doesn't convert these to dates, but instead always handles them in the form of YYYY-MM-DD
in selects, inserts and where-clauses. T.date().timeOnly()
works almost the same and uses a time without timezone
column. Inserts and where clauses can use HH:MM(:SS(.mmm))
strings, but selects are always returned as HH:MM:SS(.mmm)
.
To get this behaviour, Compas ensures that connections created via newPostgresConnection
from @compas/store, disable any conversion to JavaScript Date objects for any date
& time
columns.
Soft deletes
Compas also supports some form soft delete support via the withSoftDeletes
option passed to .enableQueries()
. This option also enables withDates
and creates fields for createdAt
, updatedAt
and deletedAt
. The generated queries by default prevent you from querying soft deleted rows. To include those you need to pass deletedAtIncludeNotNull
in the where clause. Try to minimize the use of this future, as it can grow complex quite fast. Especially if multiple entities can be soft deleted apart from each other.
// Create entity
const [entity] = await queries.entityInsert(sq, {
/* ... */
});
const [selectedEntity] = await queryEntity({
where: { id: entity.id },
}).exec(sql);
// Soft delete entity
// This also supports setting a date in the future, for when it should be soft deleted.
// A soft delete can also be removed by providing `{ update: { deletedAt: null }, where: { id: entity.id, deletedAtIncludeNotNull } }`
await queries.entityUpdate(sql, {
update: { deletedAt: new Date() },
where: { id: entity.id },
});
// No result, since it is soft deleted
// If a `deletedAt` is set in the future, it will still be returned here, till the set date is passed.
await queryEntity({
where: { id: entity.id },
}).exec(sql);
const [softDeletedEntity] = await queryEntity({
where: {
id: entity.id, // Supported everywhere, where a `where` is accepted.
deletedAtIncludeNotNull: true,
},
}).exec(sql);
// Hard deletes always add `where.deletedAtIncludeNotNull = true`
await queries.entityDelete(sql, { id: entity.id });
Other constraints
The sql generator has quite a few constraints and checks that it checks before generating any code.
// TODO: reference them and their solutions